Why do phone, internet and TV service prices keep...
Bookmark and Share
Jan 11, 2016  |  Vote 0    0

Why do phone, internet and TV service prices keep rising? Roseman

Service is growing quickly in Canada. So why do customers pay more each year?


Many Canadians feel they pay too much for telephone, Internet and TV service. Moreover, the prices keep rising each year.

Is there any truth to these complaints?


The CRTC, Canada’s telecom regulator, confirms that telephone, Internet and TV rates are going up more quickly than inflation. The average Canadian household spent $203 a month on communications services in 2014, says the CRTC’s latest communications monitoring report.

That was an increase of 6.2 per cent from 2013 — three times higher than the increase of the consumer price index in the same period.

There are some interesting trends in telecom spending, the report reveals:

Canadian households spend more on wireless ($79.08) and subscription television services such as Netflix and video on demand ($53.95), compared to Internet ($38.91) and landline telephone services ($31.10).

Wireless spending grew by 14 per cent in 2014, while Internet spending went up 10 per cent. This may be driven by a group of Canadians who have upgraded their speeds.

Landline phone spending fell 5.3 per cent in 2014 (down to $31.10 a month from $32.85). Many households with a second or third landline phone seem to be eliminating these subscriptions and signing onto additional wireless subscriptions.

Landline phones accounted for 15 per cent of household spending on communications in 2014, compared to 39 per cent for wireless services.

More Canadian households have mobile phones (85 per cent) than landlines (79 per cent). This is a change from 10 years ago, when almost every household had a landline and just over half (54 per cent) had mobile phones.

For the first time, the number of households with only cell phones (20.4 per cent) is greater than households with only landlines (14.4 per cent). A decade ago, just 2.5 per cent of households had only cell phones and 44.5 per cent had only landlines.

Mark Goldberg, a telecom consultant, did a little arithmetic to expand on the CTRC data. Among his observations in his blog:

• Canadians spend 2.9 per cent of their annual average income on communications.

• Average spending per person (not household) on phone, Internet and TV is $82.42 a month — or just under $1,000 a year.

• Lower-income households have a greater tendency to be wireless only. It may be an affordability issue, but it also makes more sense for single-member households.

The telecom industry is growing quickly. So, why do Canadians pay three times the annual inflation rate for service? Market concentration is a big factor.

The top five broadcasting and telecom companies — Bell Canada, Quebecor, Rogers, TELUS and Shaw — together accounted for 84 per cent of total industry revenues in 2014, up one per cent from 2013.

“This market concentration plays a role in the rise of bundling,” says the CRTC report, “as the largest entities are well positioned to offer their customers discounts in exchange for subscribing to a range of services.”

The number of subscriptions with bundled services rose to 10.4 million (from 8.8 million) over the past five years.

But in 2014, there was no growth in bundled subscriptions, a signal that customers are more willing to shop around as bundling discounts become less attractive.

Will Canadians get any relief from high-priced communications in 2016?

The Shaw offer to buy Wind Mobile is a hopeful sign, says Goldberg, bringing a choice of four major players in each regional market.

“That kind of differentiation is good for consumers,” he said in a blog post. “There are four well-funded mobile service providers, each with integrated multi-service capabilities in various parts of their operating territories, helping to provide a measure of diversification.

“Each of the wireless companies is associated with a company that has been operating in parts of the Canadian communications industry for decades.

“This is helpful in an industry that needs annual capital investment measured in the hundreds of millions of dollars to stay ahead of users’ seemingly insatiable demand for more capacity.”

Another hopeful sign is the rise of new wireless services, such as Sugar Mobile. You can buy a $29 starter kit to use with an unlocked phone and pay only $19 a month for unlimited talk and text across Canada when your smart phone is connected to Wi-Fi.

Sugar Mobile is targeted at teens who want to save money, as well as seniors who want to replace their landlines. You don’t have to sign a long-term contract, unlike the wireless industry’s traditional business model.

Level 3: Read the CRTC report at http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/publications/reports/policymonitoring/2015/cmr2.htm

Read the Telecom Trends analysis: http://mhgoldberg.com/blog/?p=8770Telecom

Toronto Star

Bookmark and Share

(3) Comment

By Kevin | JANUARY 13, 2016 09:02 PM
Let's not forget about those quarterly reports where these companies make over a billion dollars / quarter. Why does the government take an interest in our insurance rates and limit the companies to 10% profit yet the communication companies make more than our financial institutions? Come on now Internet must be an essential service, you can't even do your taxes without being connected.
By Jon | JANUARY 13, 2016 07:55 PM
Call it what it really is...Greed and Price Gouging...there is no need to be paying all these high prices especially in a bundled package. If you can use internet to contact anyone in the world, why do we have to pay excessively for limited data services on a mobile phone or for an additional home phone. They want to start streaming tv to force the need for unlimited internet. Everyone wants us to go online to order, to pay bills, to do banking and download instructions making us need more and pay more.
By MrKenn | JANUARY 12, 2016 01:50 PM
The cost goes up because they know we will pay. In our condo we cannot have an ariel so cable is the only way. Of course, Rogers has to pay for Skydome and the Jays and their new deal with the NHL. Sorry, I mean we have to help them pay
( Page 1 of 1 )
Join The Conversation Sign Up Login

In Your Neighbourhood Today